home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group93c.txt
/
000110_icon-group-sender _Fri Dec 3 10:23:49 1993.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-02-02
|
1KB
Received: by cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 15:41:13 MST
Date: 3 Dec 93 10:23:49 GMT
From: rpereda@arizona.edu (Ray Erasmo Pereda)
Organization: U of Arizona, CS Dept, Tucson
Subject: Re: two language questions
Message-Id: <2dn43l$9ms@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
References: <2ct1fq$aqn@caslon.CS.Arizona.EDU>, <CH0LB8.ECq@walter.bellcore.com>, <2d0uov$ub@owl.CS.Arizona.EDU>
Sender: icon-group-request@cs.arizona.edu
To: icon-group@cs.arizona.edu
Status: RO
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
In article <2d0uov$ub@owl.CS.Arizona.EDU>,
gmt@CS.Arizona.EDU (Gregg Townsend) writes:
|> Fear not. It is safe to insert and delete items of a set while the set is
|> being generated. Items that are neither inserted nor deleted are generated
|> exactly once. Norman Ramsey and Darren New each gave an example of why
|> this is useful.
|>
|> An inserted item may or may not be generated once, depending on enough
|> different factors that you might as well consider it random.
|>
Does the same hold for lists and tables?